How and Why Do You Define ‘Fantasy’?
Thursday, June 18th, 2009
Thursday’s Fantasy Sports Trade Association conference sessions began with the presentation of the association’s official definition of “fantasy sports.”
Presented by Jeff Thomas — my boss, FSTA board member and former president — the FSTA defines “fantasy sports” as …
1. A skill-based competition involving the selection of a team of real-life performers or athletes that will produce the best future statistics based on a defined scoring system, and
2. The scoring system awards points based on real-life performances and statistical results of the performers or athletes, and
3. The competition encompasses multiple, real-life events or games.
Why is this important? As “fantasy” continues to grow in popularity, more sites, businesses, etc., will seek to leverage the term to draw users to concepts that may reside on fantasy’s fringes or not even in the fantasy realm at all. Particularly in light of the UIGEA, which outlaws sports gambling online but specifically carves out fantasy sports as acceptable, differentiation matters.
Others, of course, might just genuinely not know what “fantasy” technically encompasses. For them, such a definition can be helpful.
The main question in the room at the conference, though, is whether the definition and other practices limit the industry. What about pick ‘em or bracket games, for instance? Well, they’re not fantasy. Whether you want to lump them in so that you can report a larger consumer base kind of depends on what you want.
The larger audience that could be claimed if you count NCAA pool participants could certainly look more attractive to advertisers, but it would also be a bit disingenuous. Rick Wolf, NBC Sports director of business development and Fantasy Sports Association chairman, pointed out that it would also present a less attractive consumer — one without the large average income and consumption stats that have been revealed in fantasy sports consumer research.
Beyond that, what about non-sports fantasy games? It’s a growing market and an issue that will bear further discussion among the board and the association. On one hand, it would be unwise to cut out a group of potential FSTA members (and dues payers). On the other, “sports” is part of the association’s name. How much do they need to stick to that?
Thomas did present a “fantasy model” to accompany the “fantasy sports” definition, but it’s clear that plenty remains to discuss.
As we all know, fantasy sports are solely for nerdy middle-aged men who unfailingly reside in their parents’ basements. Apparently, though, no one has shared this info with 

